chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] chicken-users vs chicken-hackers


From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] chicken-users vs chicken-hackers
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:11:10 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:39:36AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Does anyone else finds the existance of both chicken-users and
> >  chicken-hackers confusing?  I've seen some threads initiated by people
> >  crossposting (seems to be a fairly accepted usage, so I'm doing it on
> >  this message) but then half the people reply in one thread and half in
> >  the other, making it hard to follow the conversations.
> >
> >  Would others agree that we should get rid of chicken-hackers and just
> >  use chicken-users?
> >
> 
> Since there is quite a lot of development going on, I'd prefer to
> keep two different lists. But perhaps we should restrict discussions
> on chicken-hackers to subjects that really only concern the
> chicken developers.

My thoughts exactly.  Crossposting just shouldn't happen.  Is it safe to
assume that all chicken hackers are subscribed to chicken-users as well?

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth

Attachment: pgprIDmzWp4Qz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]