[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] chicken-users vs chicken-hackers
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] chicken-users vs chicken-hackers |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:11:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:39:36AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Does anyone else finds the existance of both chicken-users and
> > chicken-hackers confusing? I've seen some threads initiated by people
> > crossposting (seems to be a fairly accepted usage, so I'm doing it on
> > this message) but then half the people reply in one thread and half in
> > the other, making it hard to follow the conversations.
> >
> > Would others agree that we should get rid of chicken-hackers and just
> > use chicken-users?
> >
>
> Since there is quite a lot of development going on, I'd prefer to
> keep two different lists. But perhaps we should restrict discussions
> on chicken-hackers to subjects that really only concern the
> chicken developers.
My thoughts exactly. Crossposting just shouldn't happen. Is it safe to
assume that all chicken hackers are subscribed to chicken-users as well?
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
pgprIDmzWp4Qz.pgp
Description: PGP signature