chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [Chicken-hackers] multiple issues in embedded PCRE


From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [Chicken-hackers] multiple issues in embedded PCRE
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:19:44 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit:

> Anyway, maybe that's just a slightly different view of the "stable"
> word.  The fact is that we have a release tarball (supposedly "bug
> free"; given a version number, the code doesn't change and it doesn't
> need chicken to be compiled) and the svn branches code (development
> code, constantly changing and needs chicken to be bootstrapped).

Fair enough.  Since the tarballs don't come with eggs (there is only
one egg repository), in effect you have the best hope of using
eggs if you have the trunk code replaced.  To have what other
projects mean by stable releases, we'd have to branch the
egg repository with each release and make sure that chicken-setup
from a tarball invokes the correct set of eggs.  That way you
could load 2.731 and get the 2.731-usable eggs with it.

-- 
John Cowan   http://ccil.org/~cowan    address@hidden
In might the Feanorians / that swore the unforgotten oath
brought war into Arvernien / with burning and with broken troth.
and Elwing from her fastness dim / then cast her in the waters wide,
but like a mew was swiftly borne, / uplifted o'er the roaring tide.
        --the Earendillinwe




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]