[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] new release policy
From: |
Alex Queiroz |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] new release policy |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:24:14 -0300 |
Hallo,
On 9/3/07, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> That distinction always felt arbitrary to me. Can you define what a
> suitable version
> for a release is? Version X or version X + 1 with bug Y fixed?
> Chicken doesn't have any "unstable" versions. The HEAD is always
> (ok, should always) the best, most stable version and experimental
> versions should go into subversions branches. Software is never finished
> and never "good enough" for a release as bugs get continuously fixed.
>
Well, that's not what's happening. The trunk, which is the best
and most stable, does not build at least in linux-amd64 and mingw-x86.
Cheers,
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] new release policy, (continued)
Re: [Chicken-hackers] new release policy, Elf, 2007/09/01
Re: [Chicken-hackers] new release policy, Graham Fawcett, 2007/09/02
Re: [Chicken-hackers] new release policy, felix winkelmann, 2007/09/03
Re: [Chicken-hackers] new release policy, felix winkelmann, 2007/09/05
Re: [Chicken-hackers] new release policy, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2007/09/03