[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel
From: |
Sean Chittenden |
Subject: |
Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:13:40 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
> > At this point I'm thinking that Ruth probably offers the best near-term
> > solution. Since it essentially uses Matz's parse.y it's compliant.
> > We can get an AST out of it. From the AST we can produce PIR which can be
> > fed into imcc (at least that's how I understand that it should be done).
>
> The announcement of the current version
> (http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/33555)
> describes the parser as "painfully incomplete".
>
> Does _ANYONE_ (besides Matz in the ruby source) have a parser that can
> reliably take ruby code and return an AST? I don't want to reinvent the
> wheel, but it's starting to look like there is no wheel.
http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/ruby/downloads/files/nodeDump-0.1.7.tgz
-sc
--
Sean Chittenden
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, (continued)
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Erik Bågfors, 2002/11/13
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/14
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Dan Sugalski, 2002/11/14
- [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, David Robins, 2002/11/14
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/14
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel,
Sean Chittenden <=
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Sean Chittenden, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, David Robins, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Sean Chittenden, 2002/11/20
- [Cardinal-dev] ripper 0.0.5, David Robins, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Einar Karttunen, 2002/11/14
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Leon Brocard, 2002/11/14
Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/12