bug-wget
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transfer


From: Josef Moellers
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transferred completely
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:13:33 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

On 14.09.2017 10:12, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> On 09/14/2017 09:53 AM, Josef Moellers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have seen (at least) one server who has
>> Accept-Ranges: bytes
>> in his header but, upon receiving a request with
>> Range: bytes=23068672-
>> responds with
>> HTTP/1.1 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable
>> although the file was not transferred completely!
>>
>> wget then claims that
>> The file is already fully retrieved; nothing to do.
>>
>> E.g.
>> run
>>   wget https://downloads.dell.com/FOLDER02721216M/1/SUU_14.12.200.69.ISO
>> the, after a couple of MB, abort the transfer and then continue the
>> download:
>>   wget --continue
>> https://downloads.dell.com/FOLDER02721216M/1/SUU_14.12.200.69.ISO
>>
>> Maybe the check in src/http.c:
>> 3821   if (statcode == HTTP_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_SATISFIABLE
>> 3822       || (!opt.timestamping && hs->restval > 0 && statcode ==
>> HTTP_STATUS_OK
>> 3823           && contrange == 0 && contlen >= 0 && hs->restval >= contlen))
>>
>> should be changed and any HTTP_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_SATISFIABLE with an
>> incomplete file should show something like
>>
>> "download continue failed, file incomplete"
> 
> Well, that would be ok for this special server.
> 
> Normally 416 together with a server timestamp matching the file's
> timestamp means that the file is complete (as far as the client can
> judge from HTTP).
> 
> IMO, if the server is broken (or misbehaves) then the server should be
> repaired. Except it is a very common misbehavior. In which case we could
> consider a work-around on the client side.

OK, so I'll have a go at it.
Looks simple enough (famous last words ;-) )

Josef




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]