[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Mar 2024 13:32:16 +0000 (UTC) |
> Here is another proposal, which seems much clearer to me, but is
> probably too long:
> @itemize command argument with omitted braces should not require an
> argument, but @asis does. Use braces for @asis
I suggest
```
'@asis' needs braces here; say '@itemize @asis{}'.
```
IMHO it is not necessary in the error message to explain this in
detail.
Werner
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, (continued)
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Bruno Haible, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Raymond Toy, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Bruno Haible, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Andreas Schwab, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Bruno Haible, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/05
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Bruno Haible, 2024/03/05
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, pertusus, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Gavin Smith, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, pertusus, 2024/03/07
Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Gavin Smith, 2024/03/04