[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: annoying `note' warnings
From: |
Alper Ersoy |
Subject: |
Re: annoying `note' warnings |
Date: |
Wed, 3 May 2006 11:34:00 +0300 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Hi,
Eli Zaretskii:
> > Maybe makeinfo should do the change from @strong{Note:} to
> > @emph{Note:} internally,
> >
> > No, the difference between @strong and @emph is significant. We
> > shouldn't make the users' choices for them.
>
> I agree. Silent changes behind authors' backs are BAD.
Well, not totally silent though.
This is what happens with web browsers and HTML. Documents are converted to
proper formats internally if there is a problem with the markup. This is to
protect the readability of the document against the author's misuse of the
markup language.
--
Alper Ersoy
- annoying `note' warnings, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/05/02
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Karl Berry, 2006/05/02
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Alper Ersoy, 2006/05/02
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Karl Berry, 2006/05/02
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings,
Alper Ersoy <=
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Alper Ersoy, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/04
Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/03