[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Section number increments
From: |
Jesper Harder |
Subject: |
Re: Section number increments |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:25:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
> Jesper Harder <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I use unnumbered sections because I need two sectioning level more
>> below the lowest one in Texinfo.
>>
>> So I use @unnumberedsubsubsec for both these lower levels and
>> generate the section number myself, e.g.
>
> Sorry, I don't get it: if you use @UNNUMBEREDsubsubsec, then why do
> you need numbers for them? What am I missing?
If Texinfo had @subsubsubsection and @subsubsubsubsection commands I
would have used those, of course.
It doesn't, so I have to emulate them by using @unnumberedsubsubsec
and generating the section numbers myself.
Pesonally I find six numbered levels of sectioning a bit excessive,
but I'm converting (automatically) from a document written in TeX, and
I want to keep the same section numbers as the original.
- Section number increments, Jesper Harder, 2004/02/19
- Re: Section number increments, Karl Berry, 2004/02/19
- Re: Section number increments, Alper Ersoy, 2004/02/19
- Re: Section number increments, Stepan Kasal, 2004/02/20
- Re: Section number increments, Dumas Patrice, 2004/02/20
- Re: Section number increments, Karl Berry, 2004/02/20
- Re: Section number increments, Dumas Patrice, 2004/02/20
- Re: Section number increments, Jesper Harder, 2004/02/20
- Re: Section number increments, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/21
- Re: Section number increments,
Jesper Harder <=
- Re: Section number increments, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/21
- Re: Section number increments, Karl Berry, 2004/02/23
- Re: Section number increments, Laurence Finston, 2004/02/24
- Re: Section number increments, Karl Berry, 2004/02/24