bug-tar
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-tar] (no subject)


From: Pierre Forget
Subject: [Bug-tar] (no subject)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:24:44 -0400

Hi,

I seem to have a specific bug in Tar. On a Linux (Slackware 10 with kernel 2.4.32) server I use the following command to backup the main partition (root partition), with the Tar version 1.14:

tar -czpPlf /backup/backup-root.0.tgz --directory / --ignore-failed-read --exclude=backup --exclude=mnt --exclude=proc --exclude=sda3-dev --exclude=sdb1-dev --exclude=sdc1-dev .

This saves all the files, excpet the one's which could have been modified on the fly, which I can live with. If I do a restore or check the files in the Tar archive with tar -tf|less, I can see that I have all my important files.

On another server (Slackware 12 with kernel 2.6.23.1) I use the similar command (except for one partition exclusion) with Tar version 1.16.1:

tar -czpPlf /backup/backup-root.0.tgz --directory / --ignore-failed-read --exclude=backup --exclude=mnt --exclude=proc --exclude=sda3-dev --exclude=sdb1-dev .

The main major problem is that some important directories are not in the backup archive, such as the ETC, BOOT, LIB, BIN.

So, when I do a restore, the system cannot start. Unless I have a stupid typo, but I looked more than once before calling a bug.

I understand that I can switch to the latest version 1.20 (which I will do to make a check), but that may fool many people like me who are using the older version without checking with a restore. Unless some switches have changed, but I doubt those switches are obsolete.


Thank you,


Pierre Forget
Service Informatique Pierre Forget Inc
Web design and hosting
Network services
Webmaster for/pour www.st-donat.com
address@hidden

Spam detection software, running on the system "coldfoot.st-donat.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
address@hidden for details.

Content preview:  Hi, I seem to have a specific bug in Tar. On a Linux
  (Slackware 10 with kernel 2.4.32) server I use the following command to
  backup the main partition (root partition), with the Tar version 1.14:
  tar -czpPlf /backup/backup-root.0.tgz --directory / --ignore-failed-read
  --exclude=backup --exclude=mnt --exclude=proc --exclude=sda3-dev
  --exclude=sdb1-dev --exclude=sdc1-dev . [...] 

Content analysis details:   (4.8 points, 4.5 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
 1.4 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
[SPF failed: Please see 
http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=pierre.forget%40st-donat.com&ip=24.122.245.237&receiver=coldfoot.st-donat.com]
 0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
                            [score: 0.4123]
 1.5 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE  RBL: Envelope sender in
                            blackholes.securitysage.com
 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]