[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] (forw) tar --listed-incremental bogous?
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] (forw) tar --listed-incremental bogous? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:03:02 +0200 |
Andreas Schuldei <address@hidden> wrote:
> i am having problems with debians gnu tar, not producing
> incremental backups as expected. it seems to create just a file
> with one single current timestamp in the snapshot file, not a
> per-file timestamp with inode information as it sometimes does
> (not sure why or when).
GNU tar produces inode/timestamp entries only for the subdirectories.
Your sample script does not create any, therefore no such entries
are written.
> Please tell me how i can make tar produce proper incremental
> backups (which seem to fail for my part because of bogous
> snapshot files).
You are doing everything quite right. The archive produced by your
test script is a normal incremental archive.
Regards,
Sergey
- [Bug-tar] (forw) tar --listed-incremental bogous?, Andreas Schuldei, 2004/02/14
- Re: [Bug-tar] (forw) tar --listed-incremental bogous?,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] (forw) tar --listed-incremental bogous?, Andreas Schuldei, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] (forw) tar --listed-incremental bogous?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] (forw) tar --listed-incremental bogous?, Andreas Schuldei, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] (forw) tar --listed-incremental bogous?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Bug-tar] (forw) tar --listed-incremental bogous?, Andreas Schuldei, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Bug-tar] (forw) tar --listed-incremental bogous?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/02/17