We have to make very clear that it's not a way to collect issues about Web architecture document itself.
When there will be issues which seems more difficult to overcome, we will explain the solution we have found and adopted to solve them.
He has, for example, just accepted a role as invited expert within the CSS working group. It remains a closed, a one-way system. We require validation tools that work and are kept up to date.
We require validation tools that work and are kept up to date. And no way to have an overview of the quality checking of the web page. Like old-fashioned pre-cable TV advertising.
Think of it an aggregator of observations made by a number of different tools.
At the time of the publication, it was mentionned that a schema could be useful to help implementers to use it in their tools.
it helps harmonization of vocabulary accross specifications and maintains regularity. After discussion in the QA Team, we thought about developing a Weblog for the QA home page.
The article contained a simple RDF schema for this model.
And no way to have an overview of the quality checking of the web page.
We are testing a prototype internally, and will make it public in the days or weeks to come. The document could end up as a FAQ to write test assertions.
Now people have understood that this is just a tool.
The project is still young, and we're already working on even better usability, localization, and more, more features. He made a few points in his message which will be certainly discussed by the Web communities in the following days. At the time of the publication, it was mentionned that a schema could be useful to help implementers to use it in their tools. In fact, it is not rare that several editions of a book share the same ISBN number: in the context of the ISBN, they are similar.
How much do we eat our own dog food? In fact, it is not rare that several editions of a book share the same ISBN number: in the context of the ISBN, they are similar.
So that people can not only use it but adapt it to their own needs.
How about Wednesday, or Friday?
We think there should be a tool to gather observations made on a single document by various validators and quality checkers, and summarize all of that neatly for the user. Similarly, how can software developers better determine the correctness of the software they are creating? CSS also has a mailing list too. We will start with one implementation and invite other people to contribute their own schema to be added to the document in appendix. We published it quickly. They might not address exactly the same public: User agents versus servers. We require validation tools that work and are kept up to date.
The test metadata schema could be reused in part by EARL which is likely to make this effort even more urgent. A resource is just that: a piece of information on the Web. We think there should be a tool to gather observations made on a single document by various validators and quality checkers, and summarize all of that neatly for the user. The project is still young, and we're already working on even better usability, localization, and more, more features. We think there should be a tool to gather observations made on a single document by various validators and quality checkers, and summarize all of that neatly for the user.
Being able to get results of validation of HTML, checking of the style sheets, finding broken links, and more, much more, without having to visit ten different pages and services.