[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: does not recognize btrfs
|
From: |
Brian C. Lane |
|
Subject: |
Re: does not recognize btrfs |
|
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:15:17 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 09:39:33PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> An unpartitioned but xfs formatted LUN is recognized as xfs. But a LUN
> formatted as btrfs isn't recognized. It does mount correctly as btrfs, but
> parted says it's unrecognized. Is this expected?
>
Yes. I haven't gotten around to adding btrfs 'support' yes. The field is
only informational and, AFAIK, serves no real purpose now that we have
dropped filesystem resize support.
> parted-3.1-12.fc19.x86_64
>
>
> # parted -l
>
> Model: Virtio Block Device (virtblk)
> Disk /dev/vdb: 17.6TB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: loop
> Disk Flags:
>
> Number Start End Size File system Flags
> 1 0.00B 17.6TB 17.6TB xfs
>
In the short term I guess recognizing btrfs will break less things that
parse the output, but maybe in the next major release we should just
drop it.
I have a bug tracking this in Fedora -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767830
--
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)
pgpkoSwjhHtEO.pgp
Description: PGP signature