[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative to using partroot/new binary?
From: |
Patrick Leslie Polzer |
Subject: |
Re: Alternative to using partroot/new binary? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:26:29 +0100 |
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:19:46 +1100 (EST)
Leslie Katz <Leslie Katz <address@hidden>> wrote:
| Does that mean that I could simply boot up with the live cd, then open
| Terminal and, running suse's GNU Parted, resize
| the root partition on my hard drive? (If so, any question of the
| partroot floppy or the new binary becomes moot.)
If you're lucky, yes. 1.6.15 is a version that features some serious
(albeit non-destructive) bugs that may prevent you from doing your work.
If this happens (you will see something like "Assertion [...] failed")
just use the file I sent to you -- it's an up-to-date version).
| If I can do it that way (or even if I can't, I suppose), am I right to
| think that when I expand a partition using GNU Parted, the added bit
| automatically has the same filesystem as the original bit?
That is correct. Parted automatically resizes file systems living on a
partition.
Leslie
--
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289
pgpydm9ZqBHAM.pgp
Description: PGP signature