bug-parted
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Alternative to using partroot/new binary?


From: Patrick Leslie Polzer
Subject: Re: Alternative to using partroot/new binary?
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:26:29 +0100

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:19:46 +1100 (EST)
Leslie Katz <Leslie Katz <address@hidden>> wrote:

 | Does that mean that I could simply boot up with the live cd, then open
 | Terminal and, running suse's GNU Parted, resize
 | the root partition on my hard drive? (If so, any question of the
 | partroot floppy or the new binary becomes moot.)
If you're lucky, yes.  1.6.15 is a version that features some serious
(albeit non-destructive) bugs that may prevent you from doing your work.
If this happens (you will see something like "Assertion [...] failed")
just use the file I sent to you -- it's an up-to-date version).

 | If I can do it that way (or even if I can't, I suppose), am I right to
 | think that when I expand a partition using GNU Parted, the added bit
 | automatically has the same filesystem as the original bit?
That is correct.  Parted automatically resizes file systems living on a 
partition.

Leslie

-- 
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289

Attachment: pgpydm9ZqBHAM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]