[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes
|
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
|
Subject: |
Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes |
|
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:33:45 +1000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 04:35:21AM +0200, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> Irrelevant. Bootloaders, mini-drivers are free to ignore LBA flag for
> whatever many reasons.
The Microsoft FAT bootloaders respect the LBA flag, however. At least,
all the versions I have reverse engineered do, and I haven't seen
any evidence to the contrary.
The NTFS ones don't always.
Cheers,
Andrew
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, (continued)
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Andrew Clausen, 2004/09/19
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Andrew Clausen, 2004/09/22
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2004/09/22
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes,
Andrew Clausen <=
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2004/09/24
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Andrew Clausen, 2004/09/24
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2004/09/25
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Andrew Clausen, 2004/09/25