[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?
|
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 08:18:17 +1000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:06:48AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> Kernel reports
>
> Aug 26 10:42:15 hlu kernel: hda: 156355584 sectors (80054 MB) w/1819KiB
> Cache, CHS=9732/255/63, UDMA(66)
Is that the same kernel you used to create the other partition?
Cheers,
Andrew
- Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/26
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Pixel, 2002/08/27
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/08/28
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/28
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/08/28
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/28
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/08/29
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/29
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?,
Andrew Clausen <=
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/30