[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:23:49 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:35:41AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> My questions are what "legacy" is and if it supports cylinders > 1024.
When we're talking about legacy, we're only talking about BIOSes
(and systems that use the BIOS - and perhaps DOS fdisk).
> As far as I know, the "legacy" BIOS doesn't support cylinders > 1024.
> You can't use the "legacy" BIOS with cylinders > 1024.
"Cylinders" isn't a value you have access to. In fact, we can't ask
the BIOS anything. All information we get is deduced.
So, while it's true that legacy BIOSes will never have > 1024 cylinders,
there's no reliable way for Linux or Parted to know if the BIOS believes
there are > 1024 cylinders.
Cheers,
Andrew
- Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/26
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Pixel, 2002/08/27
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/08/28
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/28
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?,
Andrew Clausen <=
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/28
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/08/29
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/29
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/08/29
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/30