[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parted Bug: There are no possible configurations for this fat type
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: Parted Bug: There are no possible configurations for this fat type |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:52:25 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 12:00:37PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> "There are no possible configurations for this fat type" (FAT16 the partition
> used)
Strange. Well, it's not possible for me to see what happened,
since you proceeded...
> I say "Ignore"... now comes:
>
> "Warning: Filesystem doesn't have expected size for Windows to like it.
> Clustesize is 64K (536890031K expected), number of clusters is 60490
> (1073938162 expected); size of FATs is 237 sectors (1 expected).
>
> I say "Ignore" again... parted offers me to convert the partition to FAT32
> which I accept. And then it moves data and mount the partition again under
> Linux and it seems to be okay.
I'm glad to hear it :)
> I did not yet test with Windows - and currently I do not really care - but
> before my change this partition definately worked OK under Windows... so I am
> not quite sure what the "doesn't have expected size message is all about".
Don't worry about that... it's a result of the previous message.
(Well, the problem causing the previous message)
> Some further info on my machine that might be useful. When you need anything
> else, please tell me. I am on holidays from 26 July to 19 August 2002 and
> will not be at this place where I can access this computer after 18:00 today
> (24-7-2002). I hope this bug report is helpful.:
Ah, ok.
Cheers,
Andrew