bug-oleo
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: oleo-is anyone there?


From: Howard
Subject: Re: oleo-is anyone there?
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:42:09 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225

Sorry about that mispost forgot to paste new stuff, duh, found below here

Wojciech Komornicki wrote:

"Howard" == Howard  <address@hidden>
"wnk" == Wojciech Komornicki  <address@hidden>


 Howard:> Looking at the archives, I wondered if anyone at all looks at this 
list.
 Howard:>

 wnk:> I am subscribed to the list but there has been no activity for a long
 wnk:> time.
 wnk:> --
 wnk:> Wojtek


 Howard:> I was wondering, they ought to clean that mess up.
 Howard:> I am new to linux (4months) and have RH9 installed on an old  AMD k6-2
 Howard:> 300mhz laptop with win98 dual boot.  I only have 2gb (+-) hd space to
 Howard:> use for linux.  I am trying minimal apps like fluxbox (which is
 Howard:> nice),midnight commander, etc., and I wanted to try oleo.
 Howard:> I have been trying to compile oleo and am running into problems in the
 Howard:> make phase. I am going to update the gcc stuff I have installed, and 
see
 Howard:> if that helps. I  googled a couple of the errors and found that others
 Howard:> had similar problems. I subscribed here to see if I could see 
something
 Howard:> in archives, but after going back aways, got tired of sorting through
 Howard:> the junk.
 Howard:> So have there been similar problems posted here?
 Howard:> Thanks, Howard

I compiled oleo on a SUN Sparc station a couple of years ago.  I
remember having some problems but finally resolved them.  I have not
used oleo for a long time since it did not have what I needed and other
tools offered me what I did.  Let me know if you cannot figure things
out and I will try to resurect my efforts.
--
Wojtek
Well , if it won't bore you too much I can embarrass myself and explain what I have been learning about unarchiving and compiling and then creating anrpm for my rh9. Your probably Debian and I heard all about the ease of apt-get , ok, ok, I'm determined to tough out this rh9 for now. Maybe you can get a laugh out of this. hahaha I am. As I said before I am definitely a newbie to Linux. Anyhow I dld'd oleo a couple of weeks ago to try out. It's the only terminal spreadsheet I've seen, know of others? This is only the second thing I have unarch'd and compiled. The last (xisp) went smoothly and while I was amazed at what was going on, I only got a glimpse of the process. Oleo has been a different experience. Un-gz and un-tar went ok , but ./configure quickly quit after returning some error lines.
checking for gcc... no
checking for cc... no
configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH
I suprise myself now (a couple of days later) at not knowing what they meant. duh A post to my lug (address@hidden) began to enlighten/remind me that I did not even have gcc installed in my minimal install. The crummy redhat gui rpm installer's minimum development tools install would take 17?mb and I only have 200mb headspace on the whopping 2gb linux half of this hd. So I have been picking the individual packages and learning how to use rpm on the command line. Thus far I have installed- --------------------050726 reinstalling components for compiling----------------------
4,518,355 Feb 25 2003 gcc-3.2.2-5.i386.rpm
1,902,283 Feb 25 2003 gcc-c++-3.2.2-5.i386.rpm
1,273,366 Feb 25 2003 libstdc++-devel-3.2.2-5.i386.rpm dependency
188,480 Feb 24 2003 bison-1.35-6.i386.rpm
66,245 Feb 24 2003 ncurses-c++-devel-5.3-4.i386.rpm
681,193 Feb 24 2003 ncurses-devel-5.3-4.i386.rpm
482,405 Feb 24 2003 ncurses4-5.0-11.i386.rpm
6 files -Total Add'l Pkgs- 8,629,922
(who knows how much it blew up to be)
I started with the first three above and was getting these kinds of errors-
>> /bin/sh: line 1: yacc: command not found <<So I found aout about bison
>> /src/io-curses.c:116: undefined reference to `wmove'
>> /src/io-curses.c:125: undefined reference to `waddch' << which alerted me to ncurses and libs
And the latest hurdle is -
---------<snip from end of make>------------------
gcc -g -O2 -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -DBUILD_PREFIX='"'/usr/local'"' -o oleo parse.o byte-compile.o ..<snip>.. legend.o ../intl/libintl.a ../lib/liboleo.a ../intl/libintl.a -lm -lncurses -L/usr/local/lib
io-term.o(.text+0x5b3): In function `save_preferences':
/home/hlenderk/oleo/oleo-1.99.16/src/io-term.c:379: undefined reference to `errno'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [oleo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/hlenderk/oleo/oleo-1.99.16/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hlenderk/oleo/oleo-1.99.16'
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
-----which I have seen that newer things have a problem with the old errno line in configure file (I'm guessing) -ie:
http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/2004-02/msg00215.html
> http://www.compusys.co.uk/Compusys/HPC/Cluster+Admin+Tips/Compilation+errors+with+GCC+Version+3.2+and+Open+PBS+version+2.3.16.htm > version 2.9 of the GCC compiler stricter over declaring external references.
> Undefined reference to ‘errno’
> Once common error is to use the phrase: > extern int errno;
> in c code rather than the correct method of: > #include <errno.h>
> To fix this problem cd to the directory which includes the source code and type command:
> grep -rs “extern int errno” *
> files return having the line, replace with correct version shown above..."---- >> WTF is going on here? I don't know enough about this to fix it but I'd be grateful for any pointers
try including #include '<linux/errno.h>'.
You should include '/usr/src/linux_x_y_z/include' include and not the just '/usr/include' while working with modules.Raghu

So That's where I am, about to look for a line like that in the configure file, I guess.
Are you laughing yet? What do you think?
Thanks, Howard






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]