Re: [bug #33138] .PARLLELSYNC enhancement with patch

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:55:59 +0100
> From: Tim Murphy <address@hidden>
> Cc: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> 
> trying to pass kernel object handles around (seems a bit nasty to
> me)?

Why is that nasty?  The handle is returned by a documented interface,
and communicating it to another process is an officially documented
technique.  How is that different from passing file descriptors, which
are indices into a kernel-maintained array?