[bug #30381] Don't avoid implicit rule recursion quite so soon.

[Reinier Post]

Follow-up Comment #12, bug #30381 (project make):

Another idea is to make the "Avoiding implicit rule recursion" message report
which rule is being avoided.

For this it seems necessary to either add a floc field to struct rule or give
even commandless rules a cmds field so as to allow the use of
rule->cmds->floc.

Would this be acceptable?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30381>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/