[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes
From: |
Ozkan Sezer |
Subject: |
Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jul 2010 13:18:12 +0300 |
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Ozkan Sezer <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:42:52 +0300
>>> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
>>> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>>>
>>> > From: "Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden>
>>> > Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:32:15 +0000
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Follow-up Comment #9, bug #27809 (project make):
>>> >
>>> > I've applied most of the second patch. The first patch is mostly in the
>>> > w32
>>> > area so maybe Eli is a better person to review it?
>>>
>>> I will try to do that over the next few days.
>>
>> I have a question regarding this patch:
>>
>> diff -u -p -r2.27 config.h.W32.template
>> --- config.h.W32.template 25 Oct 2009 18:56:44 -0000 2.27
>> +++ config.h.W32.template 5 Jul 2010 19:43:20 -0000
>> @@ -426,7 +426,11 @@ this program. If not, see <http://www.g
>> /* Define to `int' if <sys/types.h> does not define. */
>> /* GCC 4.x reportedly defines pid_t. */
>> #ifndef _PID_T_
>> +#ifndef _WIN64
>> #define pid_t int
>> +#else
>> +#define pid_t __int64
>> +#endif
>> #endif
>>
>> Why is this needed? Is there really a MinGW64 port of GCC whose
>> version is less than 4? If MinGW64 only has GCC 4.x or later, it is
>> supposed to define pid_t in the header files supplied with GCC.
>> Please check.
>>
>
> Yes there is: w64 is supported since gcc-4.4 (even 4.3 may
> be used but very limited so that doesn't count) and I am really
> amazed how people doesn't know that. So, for the record,
> everything that I posted here are regarding gcc, not any other
> compiler. Oh, and for the runtime, headers, etc. regarding w64-
> gcc, go to: mingw-w64.sourceforge.net
>
Oh, oh sorry... W64 port with gcc < 4.x: That part no, there is not.
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Ozkan Sezer, 2010/07/04
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Paul D. Smith, 2010/07/04
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Ozkan Sezer, 2010/07/04
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Ozkan Sezer, 2010/07/05
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Paul D. Smith, 2010/07/05
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/05
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/09
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Ozkan Sezer, 2010/07/09
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes,
Ozkan Sezer <=
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/09
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Ozkan Sezer, 2010/07/09
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Ozkan Sezer, 2010/07/09
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Ozkan Sezer, 2010/07/05
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Ozkan Sezer, 2010/07/05
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Paul D. Smith, 2010/07/05
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/09
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/09
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Paul D. Smith, 2010/07/09
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Paul D. Smith, 2010/07/09