bug-make
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Static multiple target rules

From: Edward Welbourne
Subject: Re: Static multiple target rules
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:08:03 +0200 
> (While I don't think the sysV syntax is *great*, I personally think
> it's a better choice than overloading the meaning of parentheses.)

+1
It also avoids the problem of having to make sense of nesting, e.g.

>>    (b1 (c1 c2)): d1

        Eddy.
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]