[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reporting requirements
From: |
Ilya N. Golubev |
Subject: |
Re: reporting requirements |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:40:54 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.21 (linux) |
> No one is getting paid,
Unfortunately, the attitude, once established here, nearly inevitably
spreads to other situations, even exactly those of paid "support". It
would be nice to be able to nuke it in all assigned to paid support,
to automatically force everybody manifesting it to go back to unpaid
occupations, with free / open source software or other.
Unfortunately, no way to ensure that is known.
> expend the effort to do so
This tries to represent things as if some terrible effort is required.
Generally it is not so. Instead, it requires much less work than
writing the voluminous, useless (and hurting - to some, not me) reply
that started the thread. For exactly the same reason: it is inherent
ability of humans.
> way things work
Or, more often, do not work.
> you learned a lot more than
Acceptable only with `:-)': again, learning about tool internals (let
alone misfeatures or even bugs) is not desirable at best.
Agree that, personally, normally would have checked more before
posting. Why it was unacceptable to do that in that particular time
with that particular issue is improper here. My point is that users
getting in such situations are inevitable time after time, and that
such a behavior of users should be allowed, "handled gracefully" (as
many RFC say).