[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Would a --field option to frm be generally useful?
From: |
Sam Roberts |
Subject: |
Would a --field option to frm be generally useful? |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:33:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.16i |
A few things in this diff:
1 - I changed it to only print subject if get_header(SUBJECT)
returned success, otherwise I assume it would print the stack.
2 - I corrected a tiny typo in the usage message.
3 - And I added an option -f,--field that prints the named field
in the mailbox, and nothing else. Don't know if that's generally
useful, or if the API of frm is supposed to be some particular
way to be compatible with some other frm.
Also, it wouls seem to me that I should be able to provide a url
as the mailbox, but neither file://home/sam/Mail/Sent nor
file:///home/sam/Mail/Sent seemed to work for me. I didn't have
time to look for why, yet. Should they work?
Sam
--
Sam Roberts <address@hidden> (http://www.emyr.net/Sam)
frm.diff
Description: Text document
- Would a --field option to frm be generally useful?,
Sam Roberts <=