[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
\compressMMRests vs. \compressFullBarRests and \expandFullBarRests
From: |
Malte Meyn |
Subject: |
\compressMMRests vs. \compressFullBarRests and \expandFullBarRests |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jan 2018 21:18:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 |
Hi list,
while looking where the documentation of restNumberThreshold could be
adde to the NR (issue 5251) I realized that we have three ways to
compress MMRs and all of them do basically the same (though 2 doesn’t do
only one \set and one \unset but a \once \set for every rest):
1. \set Score.skipBars = ##t MUSIC \unset Score.skipBars
2. \compressMMRests { MUSIC }
3. \compressFullBarRests MUSIC \expandFullBarRests
2 is documented in English NR, 3 in German NR. I wasn’t aware of 2 until
now and of course I prefer 3 because I’ve known it for long time, but
also because you can put it in a \layout-\context block ;)
So now my question: Why are there both 2 and 3?
Cheers,
Malte
- \compressMMRests vs. \compressFullBarRests and \expandFullBarRests,
Malte Meyn <=