[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:04:38 +0200 |
2017-10-03 13:14 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> in Staff-context glissando is wrongly positioned if between notes with
>> duration \longa
>>
>> \version "2.19.65"
>> \new Staff { c''\longa \glissando c'' }
>>
>> Bug is present for 2.18.2 up to current master.
>> Worked in 2.16.2
>
> Stem for a longa is treated differently I think. It's part of the
> notehead or something?
Yep, the longa-"Stem" is part of the note-head.
But why did it work back in 2.16.2?
I compared glissando-engraver.cc of current master and 2.16.2 and
found nothing suspicious.
Ofcourse, I don't really know C++, so I may overlook relevant stuff pretty fast.
> There is the problem of longa stems getting cut
> off for preview images as well if I remember correctly. Maybe it's
> related?
Well, no clue.
Cheers,
Harm
- Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/03
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, David Kastrup, 2017/10/03
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/03
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, David Kastrup, 2017/10/03
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/03
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/04
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, David Kastrup, 2017/10/04
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/04
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, David Kastrup, 2017/10/03