[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: intent bug on line start
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: intent bug on line start |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:37:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote Friday, August 18, 2017 3:00 PM
>
>
>> bb <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> With
>>> indent = 0\mm
>>> activated the first bar will be wrong, as the first notes of voice one
>>> and two align. They should not becauser of r8 (\voiceOne ) and r16
>>> (\voiceTwo ) in front.
>>> Without, say
>>> % indent = 0\mm
>>> commented out the layout is correct.
>>
>> Cannot see the described effect. However:
>
> The effect is visible in 2.18. I can't find any
> evidence this bug was reported before, but it is
> no longer present in recent releases.
>
> @bb: I suggest you upgrade to the latest 2.19
> release. This bug is fixed there.
Ok, sorry for that. I had recently upgraded my system to 64bit and now
have been able to install the default Ubuntu 2.18.2. I was interested
to see how they dealt with Guile no longer being in distribution.
address@hidden:/tmp$ ldd /usr/bin/lilypond
not a dynamic executable
address@hidden:/tmp$ file /usr/bin/lilypond
/usr/bin/lilypond: POSIX shell script, ASCII text executable
address@hidden:/tmp$ cat /usr/bin/lilypond
#!/bin/sh
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lilypond/2.18.2/guile"
exec "/usr/bin/lilypond.real" "$@"
O.K.
Not bad at all. Maybe we should create some advice for packagers? This
here is way better than "muddle through with the current Guile-2.0 state
and let your users alone with the problems".
--
David Kastrup
Re: intent bug on line start, Phil Holmes, 2017/08/18