[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octavecheck?
From: |
Ralph Palmer |
Subject: |
Re: Octavecheck? |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Apr 2015 07:41:57 -0400 |
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Trevor Daniels <address@hidden>
wrote:
>
> Noeck wrote Wednesday, March 25, 2015 6:48 PM
>
> > Here is a guess what happens (even if that contradicts the docs):
> > The following pitches are perhaps not relative to the octave check but
> > to the previous pitch corrected by the octave check.
>
> That would be my explanation too.
>
> > This would explain it, but the docs would have to be corrected.
>
> Yes, it's a doc issue. But is it really useful in this form?
> Does anyone use it?
Greetings, Trevor, Noeck, et al. -
Submitted as Issue 4338 :
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4338
Ralph
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Octavecheck?,
Ralph Palmer <=