|
From: | James |
Subject: | Re: redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lesseningthe clarity |
Date: | Sun, 02 Feb 2014 06:03:31 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
On 01/02/14 23:23, Eluze wrote:
Federico Bruni-5 wrote2014/2/1 Trevor Daniels < address@hidden >James wrote Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:51 AMOn 01/02/14 10:14, Eluze wrote:add \single, \temporary \undo and more to the index - is that worthanentry in the tracker!?A tracker? I'd just create a patch and submit it (and create thetrackerwith git-cl for that patch). Otherwise you are going to have to say where you want the @cindex's specifically. Seems as you know how tomakea patch that you might as well do them and submit them yourself. Idon'tthink it is ever a bad idea to have index entries.I agree.Whoever takes this task, please consider also @cindex \bookpart:why - they both (\book and \bookpart) *are* in both indexes, aren't they?! (I don't know what @cindex means)
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor-big-page.html#syntax-survey Scroll down to 'indexing' James
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |