[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lyricmode regression
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: lyricmode regression |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Sep 2013 20:31:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Vik Reykja <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:39 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Vik Reykja <address@hidden> writes:
>> >
>> >> Upgrading from 2.14.2 (Ubuntu 12.10) to 2.17.27 (git head) in order to
>> try
>> >> something, I noticed my music was broken. Here is a minimal example
>> >> illustrating the problem:
>> >>
>> >> \new Lyrics \lyricmode { \skip 1.*3 }
>> >
>> > The lexer apparently thinks this to be the same as
>> >
>> > \skip 1 ".*"3
>> >
>> > I'll take a look and see whether I can find where LilyPond veers
>> off-course.
>>
>> Tracker issue: 3571 (
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3571)
>> Rietveld issue: 13256053 (http://codereview.appspot.com/13256053)
>> Issue description:
>> Stop \lyricmode { \skip 1.*3 } from failing. The problem was that
>> the lexer preferred to match ".*" as a word since the matched
>> pattern was longer than the explicit pattern matching ".". The word
>> pattern is now amended so that it does not compete with the single-
>> character patterns.
>>
>> Thanks for the report.
>>
>
> And thank you for your quick response. This does indeed fix my minimal
> example. However, it introduces several
>
> programming error: no solution found for Bezier intersection
> continuing, cross fingers
>
> in my actual file.
Unlikely. That's probably a different bug.
> I will try to come up with a new minimal example within the next few
> days.
That would be good.
> It would be nice if that error gave me some kind of clue where to
> look. Examining the pdf, I don't notice any slurs or ties that look
> bad. There is horrible collision on string numbers (this is a guitar
> piece) but I don't see what Bezier has to do with that.
Well, that's what the minimal examples are good for...
--
David Kastrup