Re: Issue 2308 in lilypond: Patch: Checks to see that stencil commands have the correct number of arguments.

[lilypond]

Updates:
        Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-needs_work

Comment #3 on issue 2308 by address@hidden: Patch: Checks to see  
that stencil commands have the correct number of arguments.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2308

DCan we resolve the question of whether this is ready or not, please? There  
is discussion in rather  . . . blunt . . . tones which suggests it needs  
work. Mike/David/Han-Wen, please update status.

Off tracker and off Rietveld discussion quoted for context:

Mike wrote
"Han-Wen,

Is there a specific reason for using a permanent Scheme variable in the C++  
instead of a lookup call to the lily module?  If it's just happenstance  
then I'll move these structures to Scheme and access them from the Scheme  
module."

Han-Wen replied:
"My idea is was to abstract the concrete list away.

There is no strong reason for that though, so if you want to change
it, feel free."