bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 1967 in lilypond: Concurrent slurs that start and end at the s


From: lilypond
Subject: Re: Issue 1967 in lilypond: Concurrent slurs that start and end at the same moment should not produce a warning
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:24:50 +0000

Updates:
Summary: Concurrent slurs that start and end at the same moment should not produce a warning

Comment #10 on issue 1967 by address@hidden: Concurrent slurs that start and end at the same moment should not produce a warning
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1967

Ah, now that you point it out, I suppose that my implementation of that warning is to blame. In 2.12, no warning was printed at all if a second slur started while another slur was already active. I.e. the following snippet was not producing ANY warning in 2.12.3:

\version "2.12.3"
\relative c'' { c4( d( g g) }

I fixed this, but did apparently not consider the case that the second slur would start/end from within the same chord/moment (which is perfectly legal and should not produce a warning...).

So, a simpler test case for this bug is:

\version "2.12.3"
\new Voice \relative c'' { << { c( d) } { e( f) } >> }






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]