[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wrong placement of BreathingSign
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Wrong placement of BreathingSign |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:04:22 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:24:42PM +0100, address@hidden wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, James wrote:
>
> > Not sure if this is a 'critical', as while it is a regression, it is
> > the same in current stable as it is in current dev (i.e. it was 'ok'
> > in 2.12 but never was, it seems in 2.14).
>
> My vote is for making it critical - I think a regression from
> any stable version is a critical regression. I don't think it's
> worth making a 2.14.X that includes a fix, but the regression
> should block 2.16.
Umm, why don't we just follow the policy? A critical regression
is anything that broken in the previous two major stable versions.
We are now working on 2.15, so any regression relative to 2.14 or
2.12 is critical. Regressions from 2.10 are not critical.
- Graham