Re: Chord fingering placement bug?

[Ralph Palmer]

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Nick Payne <address@hidden>wrote:

> On 05/01/12 07:58, Nick Payne wrote:
>
>> See below. If the note with the accidental appears first in the chord,
>> then the fingering for the other note correctly avoids the accidental. If
>> the order of the notes is reversed, the fingering collides with the
>> accidental. I don't know if this is related to issue 1222 (
>> http://code.google.com/p/**lilypond/issues/detail?id=1222<http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1222>
>> **), also concerning fingering colliding with an accidental.
>>
>> \version "2.15.23"
>>
>> \relative c'' {
>>    \set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
>> <cis-3 a-2>1
>> <a-2 cis-3>
>> }
>>
>
> p.s. I also think that Lilypond's default spacing places fingering is too
> far away from the note. It looks better, and is less confusing (see also
> issue 220) with the following overrides:
>
> \relative c'' {
>    \set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
> <cis-3 a-2>1
>    \override Fingering #'padding = #0.3
>    \override Staff.AccidentalPlacement #'left-padding = #0
> <cis-3 a-2>
> }
>

Greetings Nick and list members. This has been submitted as issue 2185 :
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2185

Ralph