Re: Issue 1663 in lilypond: Images missing on web site

[Carl Sorensen]

On 7/30/11 3:07 AM, "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> wrote:

> "Colin Campbell" <address@hidden> wrote in message
> news:address@hidden
>> 
>> Will this mean that we won't have to use the separate
>> 
>> scripts/auxiliar/cg-section.sh SECTION as in CG 5.6, Phil?
>> 
>> Colin
> 
> 
> Almost certainly not.  TBH I've not looked into why that's separate, but I'd
> be staggered if anything I've done will change that.

Phil's answer is correct.

The reason we have cg-section.sh different from doc-section.sh is that the
CG has a different file layout than the rest of the docs.

These *.sh scripts are minimal scripts to process the individual doc
sections quickly, and are not compatible with the full doc process.  But
they do test the texinfo in the relevant section.

Thanks,

Carl