[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 307 in lilypond: collision slur with tuplet bracket
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 307 in lilypond: collision slur with tuplet bracket |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Jul 2011 12:13:33 +0200 |
Between the two options attached, which one is better? I like the first...but
I'm the contemporary music attaché and know nothing about how normal music is
supposed to look :)
PastedGraphic-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
PastedGraphic-2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Both of them use:
\relative c' {
\override Slur #'details #'region-size = #6
c'2( \times 2/3 { g4 e c) }
}
The top is my current slur work, the bottom is current master.
In either case, the region size needs to be made pretty large.
I see two possible solutions:
1) Increase the region size in cases where there are potential collisions
(bad).
2) Keep the region size the same but brute-force move the base attachments to
a good region in the spirit of Beam::shift_region_to_valid (good).
Cheers,
MS
On Jul 24, 2011, at 7:29 AM, address@hidden wrote:
>
> Comment #5 on issue 307 by address@hidden: collision slur with tuplet bracket
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=307
>
> For my test case, I suggest to position the `more local' context next to the
> staff. Thus I would like to have the tuple bracket unchanged, and the slur
> ending higher.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond