[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue 1746 in lilypond: v2.13.48 docball adds offline-root/ directory
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Issue 1746 in lilypond: v2.13.48 docball adds offline-root/ directory |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jul 2011 08:12:30 +0000 |
Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Build Priority-Medium
New issue 1746 by brownian.box: v2.13.48 docball adds offline-root/
directory
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1746
Reported by Jan Nieuwenhuizen,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2011-07/msg00120.html :
% -------------8<----------------------
...and thus breaks documentation links, notably info pages.
This will probably happen in all binary builds, it happens
in GUB.
12:54:19
address@hidden:/var/www/lilypond/download/binaries/documentation
$ tar taf lilypond-2.13.47-1.documentation.tar.bz2 | grep /examples.html
./share/doc/lilypond/html/examples.html
./share/doc/lilypond/html/Documentation/web/examples.html
12:56:23
address@hidden:/var/www/lilypond/download/binaries/documentation
$ tar taf lilypond-2.13.48-1.documentation.tar.bz2 | grep /examples.html
./share/doc/lilypond/html/offline-root/examples.html
./share/doc/lilypond/html/offline-root/Documentation/web/examples.html
12:58:58
address@hidden:/var/www/lilypond/download/binaries/documentation
With this change, quite possibly we need all distribution maintainers to
update/change their build scripts. Is this intentional? Can this be
reverted? Do we need to warn package maintainers (how?).
Greetings, Jan
% -------------8<----------------------
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Issue 1746 in lilypond: v2.13.48 docball adds offline-root/ directory,
lilypond <=