[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Too many colliding rests
From: |
Ralph Palmer |
Subject: |
Re: Too many colliding rests |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Mar 2011 07:26:00 -0500 |
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Keith OHara" <address@hidden> wrote in message
> news:address@hidden
>
> Phil Holmes <mail <at> philholmes.net> writes:
>>
>> With the code at the end of this report, I get pretty good output, but
>>> get
>>> the following in the log file:
>>>
>>> warning: too many colliding rests
>>>
>>>
>> The warning is not always a false alarm, sometimes LilyPond fails to place
>> the
>> two rests "correctly". I suspect that her rules for placement require
>> keeping
>> rests away from the line of the third voice, so the warning tells us she
>> cannot
>> not satisfy all her rules.
>>
>> \version "2.12"
>> \new Staff <<
>> \new Voice { \voiceOne s4 } % just a skip
>> \new Voice { \voiceTwo d'8 r }
>> % warning before failure if voiceFour, not so bad if voiceThree.
>> \new Voice { \voiceFour a'8 r }
>> %{%} >>
>>
>> I suppose desired behavior could be for LilyPond to prioritize collisions
>> over
>> staying out of the line of the third voice, or something like that, but
>> that
>> seems more an enhancement request than bug report.
>>
>
> My preference is for all my lily source to compile cleanly, so a warning
> when there's actually no problem is annoying. Given the other collisions
> that can occur and don't produce a warning, I'd view this warning when
> there's no collision as a bug. Low priority, but still a bug.
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
> Bug Squad
>
>
Greetings, Phil and Keith -
This has been submitted as issue 1547 :
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1547
Ralph
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Too many colliding rests,
Ralph Palmer <=