Re: Bug in scipt placement in chords?

[Graham Percival]

The regtest has been changed to test ^ _ and _ ^   .  No code has been
changed; if .27 looks bad (well, if there's a mismatch between text
and graphics), then please add an issue.

Cheers,
- Graham


On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> The regtest or the behaviour?
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
> Bug Squad
>
>
> "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote in message
> news:address@hidden
> Thanks, changed in git.  It should look different in 2.13.27.
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Carrying on looking at documenting undocumented regtests and came across
>> chord-scripts.ly. It looks from this as if the regtest is trying to
>> demonstrate placement of scripts above and below the chord. Unfortunately,
>> this doesn't seem to work. There's also what seems to be a bug in the
>> regtest itself, with the line < c_^ e^^ > 4 being repeated, instead of one
>> occurrence being < c_^ e_^ > 4 which I guess is what's needed. If someone
>> can confirm these are bugs, I'll raise reports.
>>
>> \relative c''{
>> <c^^>4
>> <c_^>4
>> c^^
>> c_^
>> }
>>
>>
>> --
>> Phil Holmes
>> Bug Squad
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bug-lilypond mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>