Re: What's the deal with this "programming error"?

[Graham Percival]

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 09:46:49AM +0300, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
> I didn't know that all "programming errors" should be considered as unexpected
> and therefore should be recorded. I'll try to figure out why i didn't.

Don't waste your time; that's something for the CG to state, and
as you know I'm already in the middle of revamping that chapter.
Focus on processing other old reports that haven't been dealt with
yet.

Especially stuff that Phil Holmes finds -- he's searching through
the archives for lost stuff; please PLEASE don't ignore the emails
this time around.


PS note that the "new email checklist" does *not* contain an item
for "ignore the email and hope that somebody else handles it".  If
you can't reject the report for having no Tiny example, no version
number, not being able to reproduce it, etc., then you MUST move
on to the final point, namely adding it to the tracker.

Cheers,
- Graham