[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem |
Date: |
Sun, 18 May 2008 23:31:09 +0200 |
2008/5/18 Neil Puttock <address@hidden>:
> I just install and uninstall (the tedious bit.)
Then you're either you're a hero either you're just insane :-)
> Quite possibly; in addition, the Pitched_trill_engraver doesn't read
> the 'cautionary and 'forced-accidental properties, so even if the
> information is there, it's ignored.
Indeed. Looks like we both need to work our C++ skills before any of
us can address this...
> The way it's implemented is flawed, since there's no alteration check;
> only a cross reference between the pitch/octave of the pitched trill
> note and the localKeySignature. That's why the ges in Issue 524 has no
> accidental (ditto your example in the bug tracker.)
Does it mean you agree to consider this as the same bug?
Cheers,
Valentin
- pitchedtrill accidental problem, karim haddad, 2008/05/14
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem, Neil Puttock, 2008/05/14
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem, karim haddad, 2008/05/15
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/18
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem, Neil Puttock, 2008/05/18
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/18
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem, Neil Puttock, 2008/05/18
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/05/18
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/18
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem, Risto Vääräniemi, 2008/05/19
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/05/19
- Re: pitchedtrill accidental problem, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/19