[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:03:47 +0100 |
2008/1/6, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>:
> Please contact the author of the festival stuff about this.
OK, he has just answered me. Turns out it was definitely *not* a
duplicate, but was meant to checked if the two output files would look
the same despite minor changes in the code.
As for the festival-lilypond development, he seems to be waiting that
the Festival application itself is a bit more mature (they're delaying
their next stable release too :)
> I have made a mistake, as the file was committed without a texidoc
> header, but it may test valuable behavior.
I'll commit some texidoc explanations... as soon as I manage to get my
rsa pubkey accepted by git.
Regards,
Valentin
- regressions: song-reordering.ly, Stan Sanderson, 2008/01/05
- Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly, Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/05
- Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly, Graham Percival, 2008/01/05
- Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/01/06
- Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly, Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/06
- Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/01/07
- Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly, Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/07
- Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly, David Kastrup, 2008/01/07
- Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly, Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/07
- Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly, David Kastrup, 2008/01/07
- Message not available
- Re: regressions: song-reordering.ly, Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/07