|
From: | Graham Percival |
Subject: | Re: Whole notes tremolo, again.... |
Date: | Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:36:09 -0800 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) |
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2007/12/6, Mats Bengtsson <address@hidden>:Far from minimal! \relative { \stemUp \repeat tremolo 16 {d32 a'32 } \stemDown \repeat tremolo 16 {d,32 a'32 } \stemUp \repeat tremolo 8 {d,32 a'32 } \stemDown \repeat tremolo 8 {d,32 a'32 } }Yes, but Graham keeps bashing me on the "too much lines in your example" mode :)
"too many lines" is my way of saying "remove some material" to newbies. Technically, you could `remove' some lines by putting the whole example on one line (with 400 chars on that line).
The real deal is clarity. Removing extra material is the biggest way to clarify an example, but they're not the only way -- Mats' examples are obviously easier to understand than yours.
Plus, my point was also to emphasize the collision in a polyphonic case (which might be regarded as another bug, maybe duplicate of 523).
I don't care about emphasis[1]. If you can reproduce a bug in a simpler example, please do so.
Added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=525[1] We now have 170 open bugs. Don't assume that yours is more important than others.
Cheers, - Graham
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |