[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Segfault in old file
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Segfault in old file |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Feb 2007 00:58:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) |
Graham Percival escreveu:
> Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
>> This file, convert-lyed from the LSR, segfaults under 2.11.15. I realise
>> that this functionality is now obsolete, but I'm submitting it on the
>> basis that All Segfaults Are Evil.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Han-Wen, how evil are segfault? I have another medium-sized example (38
> lines) of a segfault; should I add these non-minimal examples to the
> tracker immediately, or should I wait until I have time to create a
> minimal example?
they are Very Evil. However, I don't have to trace exactly how a segfault
occurs, so it's usually not necessary to reduce the example.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com