Re: Barline scans

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Marnen Laibow-Koser <address@hidden> writes:

> What do you mean by "further investigation"?  My conclusion

I was referring to Werner and Han-Wen.  By further investigation, I
meant looking at printed output; comparing with the originals that
Lily's bar lines were designed from and trying to discover where it
has gone awry.

>> I am not sure where his measurement of 250% comes from, because we put
>> 190% in, where baerenreiter (occasionally?) uses 220%.
>
> 250% came from an imprecise 300 dpi image.  The 1200 dpi scan of
> Lilypond's output indeed produced 190% (ok, 191%).

Ok, but that means that LilyPond is on the black side of the scale
rather than far off it.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org