[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8)
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8) |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:54:31 +0200 |
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 14:49 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Marcus Macauley schreef:
>
> > So, Joe, whatever it is that you fixed, there still seems to be a
> > problem in 2.9.22.
> >
> > I can try to send an example if necessary.
>
> I think this went in for 2.9.23
>
> Joe,
>
> can you register all issues in the tracker, and add a "fixed2923" tag to
> it when you fix it? A simple cut & paste of the email will do.
>
> Then we know for what release it was fixed.
Sure, does that include this bug or just future ones?
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), (continued)
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Graham Percival, 2006/10/08
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/08
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Trent Johnston, 2006/10/08
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/08
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Marcus Macauley, 2006/10/12
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/17
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/10
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Marcus Macauley, 2006/10/14
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/14
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/17
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/22
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Marcus Macauley, 2006/10/22