[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-inetutils] Re: route
From: |
Debarshi Ray |
Subject: |
[bug-inetutils] Re: route |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:58:35 +0530 |
> Currently there are to many open questions to be able to consider
> libnl; including no patch that uses it for inetutils. For now it is
> better if we do not depend on it.
git://bombadil.infradead.org/~rishi/inetutils.git uses libnl.
I might merge the linux_add.c linux_del.c and linux_show.c into a
single route_linux.c since that would help in removing a bit of code
that is getting duplicated.
Regards,
Debarshi
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Jeff Bailey, 2008/09/28
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/29
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/29
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route,
Debarshi Ray <=
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/29
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/29