[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-inetutils] Re: route
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
[bug-inetutils] Re: route |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Sep 2008 07:03:30 -0400 |
> Richard, would it be OK if we license libroute under GPLv3+?
LGPLv3+, isn't it?
GPLv3+ is correct.
> rishi, do you have the email address of the maintainer for libnl?
Thomas Graf <address@hidden>
Thank you. Do you know if he is the only contributor?
> That sounds interesting. Could you post a proposal on how this might
> look?
About libifconfig?
Yes.
Please also send a proposal on how the interface for libroute should
look like, if we are to export a library we cannot change its API ever
other version. Same for libifconfig if we are to have that as well.
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, (continued)
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/27
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/29
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/30
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Karl Berry, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/29
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26