Re: [Bug-indent] indent documentation bugs

[Chipzz]

On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Carlo Wood wrote:

> From: Carlo Wood <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Bug-indent] indent documentation bugs
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:30:36PM +0100, Chipzz wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > While reading the indent man page, I found a few mistakes in it:
> >
> > In the "INDENTATION" paragraph, the -ip option is mentioned twice. The
> > second mentioning should be -pi instead of -ip.
> >
> > Also, the man page mentions the existance of a --no-tabs option, which does
> > not exist (only -nut does).
> >
> > Finally, the "COMMON STYLES" paragraph mentions the -ndj option for the GNU
> > style, which is not documented any further (maybe deprecated?)
> >
> > The same mistakes are also present in the info file (which is pretty
> > logical, I guess)
> >
> > Also, the email adress which to report bugs to doesn't seem to work. (It
> > should be 'address@hidden' where README says it is 'address@hidden')
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Chipzz AKA
> > Jan Van Buggenhout
>
> Thanks, and all of this was version 2.2.7?

2.2.6 is the version I'm using. I just got the RPM from RH 7.2 (which
doesn't include any of the README files etc btw :/), and checked the main
gnu ftp site (where I didn't get in) and a local mirror (which had 2.2.6 as
latest version).

BTW, as an unrelated side-note, the docs said ident wasn't good at format-
ting C++ code, but I did manage the format some Java code pretty well (it
made a few mistakes at some places thou)). YMMV I guess? :)

Kind regards,

Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
-- 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
                            address@hidden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------