bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Upstreaming the glibc Hurd port


From: Svante Signell
Subject: Re: Upstreaming the glibc Hurd port
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 14:05:10 +0200

On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:20 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on mar. 27 mars 2018 02:54:06 +0200, wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 00:50 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 23:53:31 +0200, wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 02:52 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > > Samuel Thibault, on lun. 19 mars 2018 02:51:22 +0100, wrote:
> > > > > > - Fixing GNU Coding Style, notably first line of files.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Could people have a look in the libpthread repository?
> > > > > Most probably, for a lot of these files, one can just take
> > > > > the first
> > > > > line of the corresponding nptl file and put "Hurd version".
> > > > 
> > > > Which branch, or master??
> > > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/libpthread.git/
> > > 
> > > Master, simply.
> > 
> > It would be nice if you could be more explicit next time when
> > writing such
> > mails. I cannot divine into your thoughts :D
> 
> Well, "master" is the default branch and all other branches are
> really
> old, I don't see why I couldn't assume that it is obvious that master
> would be the one to work on.

Well, Ive looked into the libpthread files and compared with nptl
versions, see the attached file. I seems like most nptl files are
missing the first line comments not the libpthread (i.e. Hurd) files.

Attachment: README.libpthread
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]